FLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a net margin of -20.99% compared to Fluor Corp.'s net margin of 9.08%. Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s return on equity of 17.23%.

Fluor Corp. has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.25%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.14%. Given that Fluor Corp. has higher upside potential than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp., analysts believe Fluor Corp. is more attractive than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp..

Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.295% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.39%.

Fluor Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. quarterly revenues of $195.2M. Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Fluor Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.08x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor Corp. is 0.44x versus 1.09x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec, Inc. has a net margin of -20.99% compared to Fluor Corp.'s net margin of 4.2%. Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39% beat MasTec, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.82%.

Fluor Corp. has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.25%. On the other hand MasTec, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $249.11 which suggests that it could grow by 10.73%. Given that Fluor Corp. has higher upside potential than MasTec, Inc., analysts believe Fluor Corp. is more attractive than MasTec, Inc..

Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.295% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec, Inc. has a beta of 1.938, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.842%.

Fluor Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasTec, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than MasTec, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4B. Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M is lower than MasTec, Inc.'s net income of $166.5M. Notably, Fluor Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.08x while MasTec, Inc.'s PE ratio is 53.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor Corp. is 0.44x versus 1.29x for MasTec, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a net margin of -20.99% compared to Fluor Corp.'s net margin of 4.49%. Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39% beat Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57%.

Fluor Corp. has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.25%. On the other hand Quanta Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $476.63 which suggests that it could grow by 9.52%. Given that Fluor Corp. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Fluor Corp. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.295% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.106%.

Fluor Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanta Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Fluor Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc. pays out 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M is lower than Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M. Notably, Fluor Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.08x while Quanta Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 64.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor Corp. is 0.44x versus 2.42x for Quanta Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a net margin of -20.99% compared to Fluor Corp.'s net margin of 13.98%. Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39% beat Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26%.

Fluor Corp. has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.25%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $453.33 which suggests that it could grow by 43.52%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fluor Corp., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Fluor Corp..

Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.313, which suggesting that the stock is 31.295% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.411%.

Fluor Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues of $689M. Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M. Notably, Fluor Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.08x while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor Corp. is 0.44x versus 4.37x for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.